Best Eptura Alternatives for CMMS and Asset Management in 2026

If you are shopping for an Eptura alternative, you are almost certainly evaluating Eptura Asset, the maintenance and asset side of the platform, sold until recently as ManagerPlus and now home to the retired Hippo CMMS. This guide is for property and facilities teams running maintenance across a portfolio.

This guide lists the 8 best Eptura alternatives for CMMS and asset management, and covers how we evaluated them, the key features to look for, how to choose, and how to switch off Eptura Asset without losing your asset history.

Top 8 Eptura Asset alternatives in 2026

• Facilio: Connected CMMS and CaFM that runs maintenance, assets, and portfolio operations on one IoT-native platform.
• Limble: Fast-to-adopt CMMS known for ease of implementation and clean mobile work orders.
• MaintainX: Mobile-first work order and procedure platform built for frontline maintenance teams.
• UpKeep: Technician-friendly maintenance app for work orders, meter readings, and asset tracking.
• Fiix: Asset-heavy CMMS with strong analytics and integrations for reliability teams.
• eMaint: Highly configurable CMMS for multi-site maintenance and compliance programs.
• Maintenance Connection: Enterprise asset management (EAM) with deep asset and work order functionality.
• Brightly Asset Essentials: Public-sector, education, and government asset management with capital planning.

New to the category or comparing options broadly? The best CMMS software guide covers the wider field.

Why teams switch from Eptura Asset

Eptura was assembled by combining nine workplace and asset companies, including iOFFICE, SpaceIQ, Condeco, ManagerPlus, Hippo CMMS, Archibus, Serraview, Teem, and Proxyclick. For a portfolio owner, that history shows up as an operational problem.

The most common trigger is the stitched-together architecture. Across customer reviews, the recurring themes are separate administration per acquired module, data reconciled by hand across systems, and reporting that needs a data team or a BI tool to become useful.

The Hippo transition sharpened it. Eptura retired Hippo CMMS as a standalone product and moved customers onto Eptura Asset, so long-time Hippo users face a forced migration whether or not they were shopping.

Support comes up often too, with reviewers describing response times that slip as ticket volume grows. That matters when a work order is blocking a tenant handover or a compliance deadline.

Two issues land specifically for property teams. Eptura Asset carries its ManagerPlus origins in fleet and equipment maintenance, so it fits asset-heavy operations more cleanly than tenant-facing facilities work. And pricing is quote-only across Core, Advanced, and Power tiers, which makes total cost hard to model before a sales cycle. If a legacy stack is the real issue, break free from legacy CaFM frames the wider shift.

How we evaluated these Eptura alternatives

We ranked these platforms the way a portfolio operator buys, scoring each against the criteria that decide a real shortlist.

• Implementation time: How long it takes to reach live value, from a few weeks for a point tool to months for an enterprise suite.
• Licensing and pricing: Whether pricing is transparent per user or locked behind a custom sales quote, and what is billed separately.
• Tech-stack fit: The quality of open APIs and native connections to the ERP, HRIS, and BI systems a portfolio already runs.
• Reporting overhead: Whether cross-location reporting is built in, or whether it takes manual data work and a BI tool to produce a portfolio view.
• Facilities fit, not just fleet: How well the platform handles building and tenant workflows, not only equipment and vehicle maintenance, since that is where Eptura Asset's fleet origins show.
• Asset depth: The breadth of preventive and predictive maintenance, asset lifecycle, inventory, and multi-site asset rollups on offer.

Comparing the top Eptura competitors

This table is the at-a-glance view; the in-depth reviews and per-platform comparisons follow.

Buyers who want to match Eptura's full multi-product scope sometimes also weigh integrated workplace suites such as Planon or IBM TRIRIGA. Those are heavier IWMS platforms that sit outside a maintenance-first shortlist, but they are worth a look if space and workplace management matter as much as assets.

The 8 best Eptura alternatives, reviewed

Each profile below runs to the same depth: what it is, features, strengths, limitations, a head-to-head against Eptura Asset, pricing, and what a real reviewer says.

1. Facilio

Best for: Commercial real estate and facilities teams running maintenance across a portfolio who want one connected platform rather than stitched-together modules.

Facilio is a cloud-native, IoT-based Connected CMMS and CaFM. It brings equipment, work orders, assets, energy, and tenant operations onto a single data model with a digital twin, so a portfolio manager sees the whole estate in one place instead of reconciling exports from separate systems.

That single-platform design is the direct answer to the pattern that drives most Eptura Asset switching, and it is why Facilio leads this list for multi-building operators.

Key features

• Connected work orders: Requests from email, phone, SMS, web, or walk-up land on one interface and become trackable work orders.
• Preventive and predictive maintenance: A 52-week PM calendar and resource planner, extended by IoT data for condition-based and predictive work.
• Asset lifecycle: Full asset records, history, and costs tied to every work order and space.
• IoT and digital twin: Live equipment and building data, so faults surface before they escalate.
• Portfolio dashboards: Cross-building reporting and KPIs without a separate BI project.
• Tenant and vendor operations: Service requests, SLAs, and vendor coordination in the same platform.
• Energy and sustainability: Consumption tracking and optimization alongside maintenance.
• Open APIs and connectors: Built to deploy alongside existing systems through open APIs.

Strengths

• Portfolio visibility is real-time and cross-site, so a manager sees performance across every building without stitching reports together.
• The IoT and digital-twin foundation moves teams from reactive to condition-based work using live equipment data.
• Maintenance, assets, tenant operations, and energy sit on one data model, removing the module-to-module reconciliation that defines a legacy stack.

Limitations

• Facilio is a connected enterprise platform, so a single-site team may find it more than they need.
• Pricing is custom-quoted rather than published per seat, so you need a scoping conversation to model cost.

Pricing: Custom-quoted to portfolio scope. The CMMS pricing guide explains how connected-platform pricing is typically structured.

What reviewers say: Dan B., a Vice President of Real Estate and Construction, writes on customer reviews that Facilio is easy to use and credits the team with helping track vendors and tickets across 140+ locations.

Customer proof: Investa, a commercial office real estate owner and manager, coordinates 150+ vendors on Facilio and reached a live minimum viable product in five months, with portfolio-wide visibility and stronger vendor SLA adherence. At DWTC, Facilio contributed to a 15% reduction in customer escalations and 8% energy savings within four weeks.

Verdict: The strongest fit for a multi-building portfolio replacing a legacy, module-based CMMS with one connected system.

Request a demo to map your Eptura Asset workflows onto it.

2. Limble

Best for: Mid-market maintenance teams that want to live quickly with minimal training.

Limble is a modern CMMS that built its reputation on fast implementation and a clean mobile experience. Teams leaving a heavier system tend to get work orders, PMs, and inventory running in days rather than months.

Its sweet spot is a single site or a lean multi-site team that values usability over deep enterprise configuration.

Key features

• Mobile work orders: Create, assign, and close jobs from a phone, with photos, comments, and asset context attached, so technicians work without returning to a desk.
• Preventive maintenance: Time and usage-based PM scheduling with automated triggers, so routine work is generated and assigned without manual tracking.
• Asset management: Asset records, hierarchies, and full maintenance history, giving each piece of equipment a single record of work and cost.
• Parts and inventory: Stock tracking with automatic reorder thresholds, so parts are on hand for scheduled work without overstocking.
• Work requests: A portal that lets non-technicians submit and track requests, turning informal reports into structured, assignable work.
• Dashboards: Configurable reports on work order and asset performance that teams build without a separate analytics tool.
• Integrations: Connectors and an open API for common business systems, so maintenance data flows to and from the wider stack.

Strengths

• Implementation is fast, and technician adoption tends to be high because the interface is genuinely simple.
• Preventive maintenance and work order basics are strong and cover most day-to-day maintenance needs.
• Support has a reputation for being responsive during onboarding.

Limitations

• As portfolios grow more complex, teams reach the edges of Limble's reporting and configuration depth.
• Analytics are lighter than the reliability-focused platforms for deep failure analysis.
• Advanced capabilities can sit in higher tiers, so cost rises with sophistication.
• Enterprise-scale asset and compliance requirements can outgrow it over time.

Pricing: Published tiers with a free entry option, plus custom pricing at scale. See Limble's pricing for current tiers.

What reviewers say: Kerie R., in Industrial Automation, notes on customer reviews that writing and managing work orders in Limble is about as simple as using a familiar consumer app.

If Limble is on your list, compare it against the wider field in Limble CMMS alternatives.

3. MaintainX

Best for: Frontline and multi-site teams that run maintenance from their phones.

MaintainX is a mobile-first work order and procedure platform, and one of the highest-rated tools in the category at 4.8 out of 5 across more than 1,500 customer reviews. Its strength is turning paper checklists and reactive requests into structured digital work.

It suits teams that prioritize speed of adoption and real-time communication over deep asset-finance features.

Key features

• Digital work orders: Fast mobile creation, assignment, and completion that replaces paper and spreadsheets with a live, trackable record.
• Procedures and forms: Reusable digital checklists and inspection templates that standardize how work and inspections are carried out across shifts.
• Preventive maintenance: Scheduled and meter-based PM triggers that generate routine work automatically before equipment fails.
• Messaging: In-app chat tied to each work order, keeping technician and supervisor communication in one place rather than scattered texts and calls.
• Asset tracking: Asset records with work and downtime history, so each machine carries a clear account of what was done and when.
• Parts inventory: Stock levels linked directly to work orders, so parts usage is captured as work is completed.
• Offline mode: Work continues on mobile without connectivity and syncs when reconnected, which matters for basements and remote plant areas.
• Reporting: Dashboards on work order and team performance that surface completion rates and backlog at a glance.

Strengths

• Adoption is fast, and frontline teams take to the mobile experience with little training.
• Procedures and in-app messaging keep reactive work structured and communicated in real time.
• The free tier and low entry price make it easy to start.
• Standardized digital procedures improve consistency and safety compliance across shifts.

Limitations

• For asset-heavy portfolios needing capital planning or complex multi-site rollups, it can feel lighter than an EAM-grade tool.
• Reporting depth trails the more analytics-focused platforms.
• Asset hierarchy and cost tracking are shallower than dedicated EAM systems.Pricing: A free Basic plan, then Essential at $20 and Premium at $65 per user per month, with custom enterprise pricing above that, as MaintainX's pricing sets out.

What reviewers say: Garry C., a Director of Engineering and Facilities Operations, notes on customer reviews that MaintainX centralizes work orders, asset history, preventive maintenance, and inspections in one place, with a strong mobile app for the field.

For the wider set of options, see MaintainX CMMS alternatives.

4. UpKeep

Best for: Technician-led teams that want a simple mobile maintenance app.

UpKeep is built around the maintenance technician, with straightforward work orders, meter readings, and asset tracking. It rates 4.5 out of 5 across more than 1,000 customer reviews and is an intuitive entry point for teams formalizing maintenance for the first time.

It fits smaller and mid-sized operations that want mobile-first maintenance without heavy configuration.

Key features

• Mobile work orders: Create, assign, and manage jobs from the field, built around technicians who work on their phones rather than at a desk.
• Meter-based PMs: Trigger maintenance on runtime and meter readings, so equipment is serviced by actual usage rather than a fixed calendar alone.
• Asset and parts tracking: Asset records, history, and inventory levels in one place, tying parts consumption to the assets they service.
• Requests: A request portal that lets non-technical staff report issues, which become assignable work orders with a clear owner.
• Signals and sensors: Optional IIoT sensor add-ons that trigger automated work orders from real-time machine health and anomalies.
• Reporting: Work order and cost dashboards that track completion rates, downtime, and maintenance spend.
• Integrations: An API and connectors for business systems, so UpKeep data syncs with the wider stack.

Strengths

• The interface is clean and technicians onboard quickly.
• Work order and request workflows cover core maintenance well.
• Meter-based PMs suit equipment-driven maintenance schedules.

Limitations

• Some teams report reporting and performance limits as usage scales across many sites.
• Pricing can climb once add-ons and higher tiers come in.
• Advanced reporting and configuration lag the enterprise-grade platforms.
• Deep asset lifecycle and capital planning sit outside its core.

Pricing: Published per-user tiers, with the Premium plan at $55 per user per month and higher tiers custom-quoted, per UpKeep's pricing.

What reviewers say: Tobias M., a Maintenance Manager, says on customer reviews that UpKeep is user-friendly and keeps adding useful tools, singling out its EHS features and strong standard operating procedures.

For alternatives at this end of the market, see best UpKeep alternatives.

5. Fiix

Best for: Asset-heavy and reliability-focused operations, often in manufacturing.

Fiix is a CMMS with a strong analytics and integration story, suited to teams that treat maintenance as a reliability discipline. It connects well to operational systems and supports data-driven maintenance planning.

It fits organizations that need reporting depth and integrations more than they need a light, install-today tool.

Key features

• Work orders: A full work order lifecycle with mobile and offline access, so technicians create and close work anywhere, even without a connection.
• Preventive maintenance: Scheduled and usage-based PM programs that automate routine maintenance across asset fleets.
• Asset management: Asset hierarchies, history, and criticality ratings that help teams prioritize the equipment that matters most.
• Analytics: AI-powered analytics dashboards that turn maintenance data into insight on performance, costs, and KPIs.
• Integrations: A highly open API and broad connectors to business, ERP, and operational systems that keep maintenance data synced.
• Parts and inventory: Multi-location inventory management with purchasing, so parts and stock stay accurate across sites.
• Multi-site management: Centralized control and administration across multiple facilities and asset groups from one platform.
• Condition-based maintenance: Hardware integrations such as FactoryTalk Optix that bring sensor-driven, condition-based maintenance within reach.

Strengths

• Reporting and analytics depth is a genuine strength for reliability teams.
• The integration library is broad, which helps in asset-intensive environments.
• Asset and PM management scale to complex maintenance programs.
• Multi-site asset management extends to distributed, asset-intensive operations.

Limitations

• That depth brings setup complexity, and some teams need help to configure it well.
• Facilities-first buyers should confirm it fits building and tenant workflows, not only equipment.
• The interface is more utilitarian than the newest mobile-first tools.Pricing: A free plan plus paid tiers quoted by features and scale, as Fiix's pricing describes.

What reviewers say: Rohan T., a Maintenance Coordinator, notes on customer reviews that Fiix is excellent for tracking work orders and scheduling preventive maintenance.

A deeper look at trade-offs is in the Fiix CMMS review.

6. eMaint

Best for: Multi-site teams that need a configurable CMMS with a compliance focus.

eMaint is a long-established, highly configurable CMMS. Teams with specific workflow or compliance requirements value that they can shape the system to match, rather than bending their process to the tool.

It suits organizations that will invest in configuration to get an exact fit across sites.

Key features

• Configurable work orders: Custom fields, forms, and workflows, so the work order matches an organization's exact process rather than a fixed template.
• Preventive maintenance: Flexible PM scheduling and automation that supports time, usage, and condition-based triggers.
• Asset management: Asset records, hierarchies, and history that give a complete account of each asset's maintenance and cost.
• Inventory: Multi-storeroom parts and inventory control, so stock is tracked accurately across locations and storerooms.
• Compliance reporting: Audit trails and regulatory reporting built for teams that answer to standards and inspections.
• Dashboards: Configurable KPI dashboards that teams shape to the metrics they manage against.
• Integrations: An API and connectors for enterprise systems, so eMaint fits into a wider operational stack.

Strengths

• Configurability is deep, so the system can match unusual workflows and compliance needs.
• Multi-site and multi-storeroom management is mature.
• It has a long track record with a reputation for support.
• Multi-language support suits distributed and international operations.
• Linking assets, parts, and PMs produces a complete, auditable maintenance record.

Limitations

• Configurability is double-edged, and setting eMaint up to its potential takes time and effort.
• That configuration work shows up in implementation timelines and cost.
• The experience is more traditional than the newest mobile-first platforms.
• Reporting is capable but often needs configuration to operationalize.

Pricing: Custom-quoted with a per-user structure. The eMaint pricing breakdown covers how it is structured.

What reviewers say: Christopher H., in Transportation, notes on customer reviews that eMaint is a good fit for the budget and captures information relevant to the cost.

The full picture is in the eMaint CMMS review.

7. Maintenance Connection

Best for: Asset-intensive enterprises that need EAM depth.

Maintenance Connection, part of Accruent, is an enterprise asset management platform for organizations managing large, complex asset bases. Its heritage is depth of asset and maintenance functionality across industries.

It fits enterprises that need EAM capability and are prepared for an enterprise-grade rollout.

Key features

• Work order management: Smart work order creation and scheduling that moves teams from reactive to planned maintenance.
• Preventive maintenance: Proactive PM programs designed to cut unplanned downtime across large asset bases.
• Asset tracking: Detailed asset records and history that support asset-intensive, compliance-heavy operations.
• Inventory management: Multi-site parts and inventory control that keeps stock aligned with maintenance demand across locations.
• Reporting: A library of 360+ included reports and dashboards that surface KPIs without building analytics from scratch.
• Deployment options: Cloud or on-premises deployment, giving regulated and security-conscious buyers a choice.
• Codeless configuration: Configure workflows, forms, and reports without custom development, so changes do not require engineering.
• Mobile offline: Technicians manage work orders and assets in the field without connectivity, syncing when back online.
• Integrations: Connectors to BI, ERP, and other Accruent products such as the Meridian document system.

Strengths

• Asset and maintenance functionality is deep and enterprise-grade.
• Cloud or on-premises deployment gives flexibility that regulated buyers value.
• The reporting library is extensive out of the box.

Limitations

• The interface can feel legacy compared with newer platforms.
• Enterprise rollouts carry the implementation weight that comes with EAM.
• Getting full value often means adopting other Accruent products.
• Pricing is quote-only, so total cost is hard to model without a sales cycle.

Pricing: Custom-quoted at the enterprise level. The Accruent pricing breakdown covers the Accruent portfolio.

What reviewers say: Anne Marie C., in Printing, says on customer reviews that support is outstanding and the team responds quickly to questions.

For a connected-platform comparison in this tier, see the best Accruent alternative.

8. Brightly Asset Essentials

Best for: Education, government, and public-sector teams with capital planning needs.

Brightly Asset Essentials, part of Siemens, is an asset and maintenance platform with a strong footprint in schools, campuses, and public agencies. Its capital planning and lifecycle tools suit organizations budgeting for infrastructure over long horizons.

It fits public-sector and education teams that plan capital spend as much as day-to-day maintenance.

Key features

• Work orders: Request-to-completion work order management that routes and tracks maintenance across a public-sector estate.
• Preventive maintenance: Scheduled PM programs that keep aging public infrastructure serviced on time.
• Asset management: Asset records, condition ratings, and history that inform long-term maintenance and replacement decisions.
• Capital forecasting: Long-range capital planning and budgeting tools built for organizations funding infrastructure over years.
• Inventory: Parts and inventory tracking tied to work orders, so stock supports scheduled maintenance.
• Reporting: Maintenance and asset reports designed for board, budget, and compliance reporting cycles.
• Integrations: Connectors for public-sector and enterprise systems, so Asset Essentials fits existing government and education stacks.

Strengths

• Sector fit for education and government is strong and well established.
• Capital planning and forecasting suit long infrastructure budgeting cycles.
• Asset and PM management cover core public-sector needs.
• Reporting and dashboards align with board and budget reporting cycles.

Limitations

• It leans less on real-time and IoT-driven workflows than newer platforms.
• Some users find the interface dated.
• It is optimized for public-sector budgeting cycles more than fast-moving commercial operations.

Pricing: Custom-quoted by organization and modules. The Brightly pricing breakdown covers the structure.

What reviewers say: Glenn L., in Food and Beverages, notes on customer reviews that support is outstanding and the platform is easy to use with plenty of features.

A direct comparison is in the Brightly CMMS review and Brightly vs Facilio.

Key features to look for in an Eptura alternative

Use this as your shortlist filter, and weigh how many of these capabilities a platform delivers from one system rather than several bolted-together modules.

• A unified data model: One platform where assets, work orders, and reporting share the same records, instead of a separate admin console per acquired product.
• Cross-location reporting: Real-time CMMS reports and dashboards that roll up across buildings without a manual data-crunching step.
• Condition and IoT insight: Live equipment data driving condition-based work, not only calendar-based routines.
• Predictive maintenance: Data-driven forecasting of failures on top of scheduled preventive maintenance.
• Mobile work order management: Create, assign, and close work from the field, with photos and asset history attached.
• Inventory and parts control: Barcode or RFID tracking of parts and assets tied directly to work orders.
• Open APIs and connectors: Clean, documented integrations into ERP, HRIS, and BI so the platform fits your stack.
• Identity and access: SSO and SCIM provisioning so access scales cleanly across sites and teams.
• Transparent commercial terms: Whatever the pricing model, a clear number and a written list of what costs extra.

The platforms below are ranked partly on how many of these they deliver from one connected system.

How to choose the right Eptura alternative

Work through these steps in order, and the shortlist narrows itself to the platform that fits your portfolio and your stack.

• Step 1, scope your needs: Decide whether your priority is facilities and tenant operations across a portfolio, or equipment and asset maintenance at a site. That single choice separates a connected platform from a maintenance point tool.
• Step 2, pick your philosophy: All-in-one suites match Eptura's multi-product scope but cost more and deploy slowly. Point tools set up fast but leave you managing integrations. A connected platform gives one system without the module sprawl.
• Step 3, shortlist by portfolio shape: Single site or a lean team, look at Limble, MaintainX, or UpKeep. Asset-intensive or reliability-led, look at Fiix, eMaint, or Maintenance Connection. Multi-building portfolio wanting one connected system, look at Facilio.
• Step 4, pilot before you commit: Stand up one building or region, load real assets and work orders, and test reporting and mobile use with the actual team.
• Step 5, price the full picture: Get every cost in writing, including implementation, integrations, and what sits in higher tiers, before you sign.

For the broader landscape, the best maintenance management software and best EAM software guides are useful next reads, and enterprise facility management software covers portfolio-scale needs.

How to switch from Eptura Asset without losing asset history

Follow a phased migration and your years of asset records, work order history, and PM schedules move across intact. This matters most for teams leaving a retired Hippo CMMS instance, where staying put is not an option.

• Export: Pull your full data set from Eptura Asset, assets, locations, work order history, PM schedules, parts, and vendors, in a structured format.
• Map: Match every field to the new platform's data model before loading, so history lands in the right place.
• Pilot: Stand up one building or region first, validate the data, and run real work orders for a cycle.
• Cut over: Roll out to the rest of the portfolio in waves, keeping the old system read-only until each wave is verified.
• Verify: Reconcile asset counts, open work orders, and PM calendars against the source before retiring the old instance.

Data exchange during a migration depends on the integrations you arrange and each vendor authorizes. A platform built for open CMMS integrations makes the export and load steps far less painful than a closed system does.

The bottom line

Eptura Asset is a capable but legacy CMMS carried inside a nine-product stack, and the reasons teams leave, module sprawl, hand-built reporting, and a forced Hippo migration, are architectural rather than cosmetic. The eight alternatives here cover every shape of portfolio, from fast point tools to full EAM.

For a multi-building portfolio that wants to trade a module stack for one connected system with real-time visibility, Facilio is the clearest fit.

Request a demo and bring your current Eptura Asset workflows, and we will map them onto a single platform.

Frequently asked questions