UpKeep vs Facilio: Features, AI, Pricing & Which One Should You Choose
UpKeep and Facilio are two commonly used CMMS platforms that show up on the same shortlists. They share a category label, overlap on feature checklists, and get compared in the same evaluation cycles.
But they were built for different operations and that difference matters more than any individual feature row.
We have tried to break down what each platform actually does, where each one fits, and where the architecture diverges, so you can make the right call before committing.
Not sure which CMMS fits your operation?
Talk to the Facilio teamUpKeep: The Asset Operations Specialist
UpKeep was founded in 2014 by Ryan Chan, a process engineer who watched maintenance teams lose hours shuttling between the factory floor and a desktop just to log a work order. That origin explains every design decision that followed, UpKeep is built from the field up, not the portfolio down.
The company has raised $36M in Series B funding (Insight Partners, Emergence Capital, Y Combinator) and serves 4,000+ companies across manufacturing, healthcare, and property management.
Its current positioning: Asset Operations Management — maintenance, reliability, and operations data in one system.
Two product additions worth knowing before comparing:
- Nova AI — autonomous background agent for work order generation, equipment monitoring, and voice-first field access
- UpKeep Edge — proprietary IoT sensor hardware for condition monitoring. A separate procurement, not a native BMS integration
Where it genuinely earns its reputation:
- Asset lifecycle depth — maintenance history, depreciation, and warranty tracking
- Clean, intuitive UX — consistently praised across G2 and Capterra
- 100+ pre-built integrations including SAP, Slack, and Azure
- Structured onboarding packages with minimal IT involvement
"Great asset management features. Scaling and customising to meet business needs is super easy."
— Verified user, Facilities Management · G2
UpKeep CMMS: Features, Pricing Plan, and What You'll Actually Pay
UpKeep's core is solid. The friction shows up when you map the features your operation actually needs against the tier required to unlock them.
Key features and what they cost you:
- Work orders & PM — Strong out of the box. Workflow automation requires Enterprise; PM scheduling requires Premium+
- Asset management — UpKeep's clearest lead. Depreciation and warranty tracking available at Professional+
- Parts & inventory — Costing at Premium+; purchase order management is Enterprise-only
- API access — Enterprise-only. If integrations are part of your evaluation, factor Enterprise pricing in from the start
- Nova AI — Covers maintenance workflows: work order generation, equipment monitoring, voice access. Does not extend to helpdesk intake, invoice validation, or portfolio-level reporting
Pricing
No free plan and 7-day trial only. Implementation packages start at $1,500. UpKeep Edge sensors are a separate hardware cost, entirely outside the subscription.
UpKeep is a strong fit if:
- Your operation is single-site or a small estate
- Depreciation and warranty tracking drive most asset decisions
- Per-user pricing works at your current team size
But, UpKeep will feel limited when:
- Multi-site visibility becomes a daily requirement
- BMS integration is needed without procuring new hardware
- Tenant or vendor management enters the picture
- AI scope needs to go beyond maintenance workflows
Facilio: A Different Architecture for a Different Problem
UpKeep is a CMMS with an asset layer and IoT bolted on.
Facilio, whereas, is a Connected CMMS platform where maintenance, vendor management, tenant engagement, energy management, compliance, and AI automation are native to the same architecture. That distinction matters more than any feature comparison.
The clearest example: multi-site management in UpKeep is an Enterprise-tier unlock. In Facilio, it is the base architecture. The platform was built for portfolio operations from day one, not retrofitted for them.
The AI gap
For enterprise buyers, this is increasingly the decision point.
Nova AI is a background automation layer built for maintenance teams. It generates work orders from sensor data, flags equipment anomalies, and gives technicians voice-first access to the system in the field.
For what it was designed to do, it works. The ceiling is the scope, Nova operates within the maintenance workflow and stops there.
Facilio’s Atom AI suite operates across the entire FM back-office. The agents don't assist humans through a workflow, they run the workflow end to end, escalating to humans only when a decision requires it. The difference in practice:
| Capability | UpKeep Nova AI | Facilio Atom |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Maintenance workflows | Full FM back-office |
| Helpdesk intake | Not available | Helpdesk AI Agent — 24/7 across calls, WhatsApp, email, chat80% autonomous resolution · Berkeley UAE, live |
| Invoice validation | Not available | Invoice Validation Agent — 3-way matching across quotes, WOs, and invoices619 errors caught before approval · Charter Hall, live |
| Operational reporting | Not available | Reporting Agent — auto-generates MMRs, SLA reports, vendor scorecardsReports that took 3 days now run overnight |
| In-workflow assistant | Voice-first field access | FM Copilot — NL queries, work order actions, job reassignment without dashboard switching |
Where Nova reduces friction for technicians on the floor, Facilio's Atom AI agents removes entire categories of manual work from the FM back-office. Helpdesk calls that needed a coordinator. Invoices that needed a finance review. Reports that needed a manager's weekend. These aren't workflow improvements, they are workflows that no longer require human execution at every step.
The other distinction worth stating plainly: Atom is live in production. The numbers above are not benchmarks or pilots, they are outcomes from deployed operations running today.
Where the platform gap extends further:
- Tenant management: UpKeep has no tenant-facing layer. Facilio includes a full occupant portal with SLA tracking by client
- Vendor management: UpKeep offers basic requester access. Facilio covers full vendor scorecards and automated compliance document tracking
- Energy management: Not available in UpKeep. Native in Facilio, relevant for any operator with sustainability obligations or utility cost accountability
Watch Facilio Atom in action — see live FM automation, not a slideshow.
Book a DemoUpKeep vs Facilio: Feature to Feature Comparison
Both platforms cover the CMMS fundamentals like work orders, preventive maintenance, asset tracking, and mobile access. Where we noticed the gaps opening up is when operations grow beyond a single site, or when the scope expands to vendors, tenants, energy, and compliance.
The table below maps where each platform stands across the dimensions that matter most.

UpKeep vs Facilio: Which One Should You Choose
Neither platform is the universal answer. The right call depends on what your operation actually looks like today and where it's headed.
Choose UpKeep if:
- Your operation is single-site or a small estate where asset lifecycle data drives most decisions
- Technician adoption speed is the primary constraint
- Per-user pricing works at your current team size
- You prefer a structured, packaged onboarding path (Quickstart or Advanced)
Choose Facilio if:
- You manage a multi-site portfolio and need cross-site KPIs as standard, not as an Enterprise add-on
- Vendors, tenants, and occupants are part of your service delivery — not just internal maintenance teams
- You have BMS infrastructure in place and need software integration, not new hardware
- Your AI requirement is back-office automation — not just field-facing workflow assistance
- Per-usmobilecing has become a barrier as the team and portfolio scale
If you are still weighing your options more broadly, our breakdown of the best UpKeep alternatives in 2026 covers the wider competitive landscape, including where different platforms fit by operation type and scale.
What Facilio looks like in practice:
- Skeens Warehouse Services: 100% of manual contractor check-ins eliminated. Compliance document tracking automated across a nationwide network, with operations since expanded to Canada and the UK.
- Charter Hall: 2,117 invoices processed through Facilio's Invoice Validation Agent. 619 errors caught before approval, eliminating 70+ hours of manual FM work per month.
- Berkeley UAE: 276 calls and 175 service requests handled in 30 days through Facilio's Helpdesk AI Agent. One line running 100% autonomous from day one.
If your operation has outgrown a single site, added vendors, taken on tenant obligations, or started asking questions that a maintenance tool was never built to answer, the gap between a CMMS and a connected operations platform becomes real very quickly.
Facilio was built for exactly that inflection point. Not as the next step up from UpKeep, but as a different category of platform for a different scale of problem. If that sounds like where your operation is headed, it is worth a conversation.
UpKeep manages your assets. Facilio runs your operation. Ready to see the difference?
Shcedule a Live Demo NowFrequently Asked Questions
1. Is Facilio better than UpKeep?
For maintenance-only teams managing a single site, UpKeep does the job. For operations spanning multiple sites, vendors, tenants, and compliance obligations, Facilio is the stronger platform, built for that complexity from the ground up, not retrofitted for it.
2. What is the main difference between UpKeep and Facilio?
UpKeep is a CMMS built around asset tracking and field-first maintenance. Facilio is a Connected CMMS platform covering maintenance, vendor management, tenant engagement, energy management, and AI automation, an all on one architecture, not assembled from add-ons.
3. Can UpKeep handle multi-site operations?
Yes, but only at Enterprise tier and it shows. Multi-site visibility in UpKeep is an upgrade; in Facilio it is the base architecture, built for portfolio-scale operations from day one.
4. How does UpKeep Nova AI compare to Facilio Atom?
Nova AI covers maintenance workflows. Facilio Atom goes further, a Helpdesk AI Agent resolving 80% of requests autonomously, an Invoice Validation Agent that caught 619 billing errors at Charter Hall, and a Reporting Agent that generates MMRs overnight. Live in production, not on a roadmap.
5. What does UpKeep cost for enterprise teams?
The per-user model scales painfully. Add implementation costs, Edge sensor hardware, and the Enterprise requirement for API access, the real bill lands well above the published starting price.
6. Which platform is better for property management?
Facilio. UpKeep has no tenant portal, no native energy monitoring, and no occupant-facing layer. Facilio was built specifically for property owners and FM service providers like tenant engagement, vendor compliance, and energy management are core, not bolted on.
More from Facilio