Eptura Pricing 2026: Plans, Real Costs, and What Buyers Pay

Eptura does not publish pricing. Every number is quote-only, billed annually on a one-year minimum, and the figure that lands in your inbox depends on how many of its products you take, how many users you license, and what the sales team decides your account is worth. That is the honest answer to "how much does Eptura cost," and it is the reason you are reading this instead of a price page.

Here is the part most buyers miss. When you ask for "Eptura pricing," you are not pricing one product. You are pricing a holding company. Eptura was assembled from nine workplace and asset businesses, and the quote you get is really two, three, or four products bundled under one logo. This breaks down what each piece costs, the fees that surface after signature, and how to model the real number before you spend a sales cycle finding out. If you are weighing replacements, pair it with our rundown of the best Eptura alternatives for CMMS and asset management, or go straight to how a connected facility management software platform changes the math.

Why "Eptura pricing" is really four prices

Eptura is the product of a merger. It combined iOFFICE, SpaceIQ, Condeco, ManagerPlus, Hippo CMMS, Archibus, Serraview, Teem, and Proxyclick into a single brand. Those tools did not dissolve into one system. They were grouped into product families that are still licensed, quoted, and administered separately.

That matters for your budget. A workplace-experience team shopping for desk and room booking lands on Eptura Workplace. A maintenance team shopping for a CMMS lands on Eptura Asset. If you need both, which many multi-site operators do, you are buying two platforms, paying two subscriptions, running two admin consoles, and paying to connect them. The single logo hides a multi-product invoice.

So before you compare Eptura to anything, map which Eptura you actually need. The pricing conversation changes completely depending on whether you want the workplace side, the asset side, or the whole suite.

Eptura pricing overview

Because Eptura keeps every number behind a demo, the table below uses figures reported by third-party review and procurement sites. Treat them as calibration for budgeting, not quotes.

All plans bill annually on a minimum one-year commitment, and none offers a free version. For context on how this compares to the wider category, our breakdown of CMMS pricing models walks through per-user, per-asset, and per-site structures you will see across vendors.

Eptura Asset pricing: the CMMS and EAM side

Eptura Asset is the maintenance platform, built on the ManagerPlus and Hippo CMMS lineage. It handles work orders, preventive maintenance, asset and equipment records, inventory, and fleet. It is sold in three tiers, Core, Advanced, and Power, and according to Software Advice, all three require a direct quote with no publicly listed price and no free trial.

On numbers, third-party sources put the entry point near $25 per user per month, while legacy ManagerPlus plans were cited closer to $85 and $125 per user per month for higher tiers. For historical reference, before Eptura retired the standalone product, TrustRadius recorded Hippo CMMS starting around $35 per user per month, with Hippo Plus near $55. Those are the prices many current Eptura Asset customers were migrated away from, which is central to the complaints below.

Eptura does not publish a per-tier feature matrix or price list, so the tiers below pair its public tier names with scope and per-user figures reported by third-party sites. Treat them as budgeting calibration, not quotes.

Where it genuinely delivers: Reviewers credit Eptura Asset for letting you track an unlimited number of assets and parts without the per-asset metering some rivals charge, which helps asset-heavy operations keep costs predictable. The core work-order and preventive-maintenance workflows are solid, and ManagerPlus has real depth in fleet and equipment maintenance.

Where buyers get cautious: On Software Advice, Eptura Asset holds 3.9 out of 5 across 207 reviews, but its value-for-money score sits lower at 3.4 out of 5, and reviewers flag billing and support communication as recurring friction. The quote-only model across every tier makes total cost hard to model before you commit sales time, and the forced move off Hippo soured a lot of long-tenured accounts.

If asset and maintenance management is your real need, compare the tier logic against how a connected approach handles equipment maintenance software and where a fixed asset management software layer fits. The distinction between a maintenance system and a full asset-lifecycle system is worth understanding, which our explainer on CMMS vs EAM unpacks.

Eptura Workplace pricing: space, desk, and visitor

Eptura Workplace is the worktech side, carrying the iOFFICE, SpaceIQ, and Condeco DNA. It covers space and move management, desk and room booking, and workplace analytics. It is offered in Advanced and Power tiers, both quote-only.

Third-party estimates on Software Finder put Workplace in the range of $20 to $100 per user per month, with a wide spread because the number depends heavily on module mix and user count. The bigger line item is onboarding. Review sites cite implementation around $50,000, and installation plus training reaching $50,000 to $100,000 for larger rollouts, per aggregated data on SelectHub. For a workplace-experience suite, that implementation layer often dwarfs the first year of licenses.

An honest boundary: If what you need is pure hybrid-work desk and room booking, Eptura Workplace is a legitimate choice in a category built around that job. A connected maintenance and operations platform is not a hot-desking tool, and you should not pick one expecting the other. The place these worlds overlap, and where the pricing comparison gets interesting, is multi-site operations: space, assets, maintenance, compliance, and vendors across a portfolio. That is where buying Workplace and Asset separately starts to cost more than it should. If space and portfolio planning sit at the center of your decision, our guide to IWMS software and the primer on what is IWMS software explain how the integrated-workplace category is priced.

Eptura Engage and Visitor

Eptura Engage is the employee experience app, with third-party estimates around $5 to $15 per user per month. Eptura Visitor handles reception and visitor flows. Both are quote-only, and both are typically added onto a Workplace or Asset contract rather than bought alone. Each add-on is another line on the invoice and another system to administer, which is the recurring theme of Eptura pricing: the base number is rarely the final number.

The hidden cost layer: implementation, migration, and renewal

Implementation and onboarding. For the Workplace suite, reported implementation runs $50,000 to $100,000. Asset deployments are lighter but still carry setup, data migration, and training costs that rarely appear in a first quote.

The Hippo migration tax. Eptura retired Hippo CMMS as a standalone product and moved customers onto Eptura Asset. Long-time Hippo users describe a forced migration that was, in one account, "not a great experience" with "a lot of mix up" and "very time consuming." Many also report paying more post-migration than they did for the product they started on.

Renewal escalation. This is the cost that stings most. Post-acquisition reviews across Capterra and G2 repeatedly flag that pricing climbed relative to the pre-rebrand products, Condeco, iOFFICE, Proxyclick, and Hippo, while some customers felt support and integration reliability slipped. The iOFFICE and Eptura Workplace reviews on Capterra capture that sentiment directly.

There is a quieter cost too, and it applies to any disconnected stack, not just Eptura. When your space system, your asset system, and your visitor system do not share a data model, your team spends its days reconciling them by hand. Reports get rebuilt in spreadsheets. A fault in a building system never reaches the work-order queue until someone calls it in. That reconciliation labor is a real operating expense, it just never shows up as a line on the invoice, and it grows with every site and every module you bolt on.

Eptura pricing examples: the real year-one math

Ranges are easy to wave away, so here are three deployments modeled end to end. Every figure is a third-party estimate assembled into a scenario, not an Eptura quote, and each uses the mid-point of the tier ranges above so you can see how the pieces stack.

What a connected platform takes off this bill: In Examples 2 and 3, the costs that exist only because Eptura is several products, namely the second and third subscription's separate implementation, the inter-product integration line, and the duplicate admin overhead, are exactly what a single connected platform folds into one deployment and one license. That is a structural saving independent of any per-user rate. Facilio quotes to scope rather than listing a price, so you still book a demo for your number, but the line items it removes are the ones visible above.

At small scale with a single product, Eptura Asset is affordable. As you add products and sites, the multi-module structure and the implementation layer push the real number well above the per-user math. If you want to sanity-check these numbers against named competitors, we keep current breakdowns for Planon pricing, Limble CMMS pricing, MaintainX pricing, UpKeep pricing, Fiix CMMS pricing, and Corrigo CMMS pricing.

Is Eptura worth it? By team type

For single-site SMB teams: If you need a straightforward CMMS and nothing else, Eptura Asset at the Core tier is a reasonable, affordable option, and the unlimited-assets model is a genuine plus. Just get the full fee schedule, including setup and any module charges, in writing before you compare.

For mid-market teams running 10 to 50 sites: This is where the suite logic gets expensive. You likely need maintenance and space and vendor coordination, which means Asset plus Workplace plus integration plus a heavier implementation. The all-in cost often lands well above the headline per-user figure, and the two products still operate as two systems. A platform that covers maintenance management, inventory, procurement, and portfolio visibility under one license frequently comes in lower on total cost of ownership.

For enterprise portfolios of 100+ sites: At this scale the deciding factor is not the license, it is whether the system can run operations across a portfolio without armies of integration work. Eptura can be configured to serve large estates, but the module sprawl, separate consoles, and renewal escalators make the long-run number hard to control. This is the tier where a connected architecture earns its keep.

The connected alternative: one platform instead of four quotes

The structural issue with Eptura pricing is not that it is quote-based. Plenty of serious platforms, including Facilio, quote rather than publish, because enterprise scope varies too much for a sticker price. The issue is that an Eptura quote is often four products pretending to be one, each licensed, administered, and integrated at its own cost.

Facilio takes the opposite shape. It is a cloud-native Connected CMMS that unifies maintenance, assets, inventory, procurement, vendors, and building-system data on one platform, with a no-code layer so teams configure workflows without a professional-services bill for every change. Instead of buying space and asset and visitor as separate subscriptions and paying to connect them, you license one operation. Pricing is organized into Standard, Essential, and Enterprise tiers and quoted to your deployment scope, which you can see on the Facilio pricing page.

The outcomes are what make the cost case concrete, and they come from named, dated customer deployments as of 2026:

That approach is why Facilio was named a Leader in the 2025 Verdantix Green Quadrant for Commercial Buildings CMMS, independent validation that a connected model holds up against the legacy and suite incumbents.

To be fair about the trade-offs: Facilio is purpose-built for property and facility operations, so a team that only wants a lightweight hot-desking app will find it more platform than they need, and like most enterprise platforms it quotes rather than lists prices, so you still book a call to get your number. The difference is what that one number covers. For a head-to-head on roster and fit, our list of the best CMMS software puts the options side by side.

Already on Eptura, or migrating off Hippo?

If you are staring down a Hippo-to-Asset migration or an Eptura renewal that came back higher than expected, you do not have to rip out what works to fix the cost and connectivity problem. Facilio is built to connect and unify existing systems rather than replace them wholesale, which means you can overlay a single operations layer, consolidate the reporting and workflows that are currently scattered across modules, and retire the pieces that no longer earn their license on your own timeline.

The goal is not another migration for its own sake. It is getting out of the multi-product invoice and the reconciliation labor that comes with it, and back to running buildings.

The bottom line

Eptura pricing is quote-only, annual, and, for most real deployments, a bundle of four separately licensed products with an implementation and renewal layer that outweighs the per-user math. For a single-site maintenance team, Eptura Asset is an affordable and capable CMMS. For multi-site operators who need maintenance, space, and vendors working together, the suite structure and its hidden costs make the true number hard to control, and a connected platform licensed as one operation is usually the lower-TCO, lower-friction path. Model the whole invoice before the demo, get every fee in writing, and compare on total cost of ownership rather than the headline per-user figure.

See what one connected platform would cost for your portfolio. Book a 30-minute Facilio demo and we will map it to your sites, assets, and vendors.

Frequently asked questions